Special Report

Election 2012

Minnesotans reject amendment to ban same-sex marriage

Minnesotans voted against a constitutional amendment that would define marriage as between a man and a woman.

Hours after Colorado had legalized marijuana and three other states had approved same-sex marriages, Minnesotans watched as fractions of percentages ticked upward and downward for each county’s vote tally on a constitutional amendment proposed to ban same-sex marriage in the state.

Unlike Maine, Maryland and Washington, which all legalized gay and lesbian marriages by margin of about 4 percent, Minnesotans narrowly rejected the constitutional amendment proposed to ban same-sex marriages in the state. The votes represented the first four positive results for the gay and lesbian communities after 31 defeats in other states. While the amendment did not legalize marriage in Minnesota, it was would have defined marriage as between only one man and one woman, making it virtually impossible for proponents of same-sex marriage to overturn a 1997 law banning it in the state.

Votes favoring the amendment did climb steadily throughout the evening, resting at 49.05 percent around midnight, before steadily dropping as the remaining results of the Twin Cities-Metro area came in. By morning, 51 percent of Minnesotans had voted to reject the proposal.

“We’re very excited with the outcome,” said Joseph (Joe) Reid of St. Paul. “We knew it was close, but honestly I was afraid we would lose.” Reid’s younger brother is gay and has been in a committed relationship for roughly as long as the Reids have been married—40 years.

Reid, 73, and his wife, Sharon, 71, voted against the majority of their age group, which strongly urged passage of the amendment. Minnesota’s vote was evenly split by gender, but age played a role in the amendment’s defeat. Individuals 45 and older comprised 55 percent of voters and generally voted to pass the amendment, but those younger than 45 strongly voted no. In fact, 67 percent of voters age 18-to-29, and 59 percent of voters 30-to-44 years old were in the latter group.

Throughout the campaign, the Reids worked for votes against the amendment. They held a fundraiser in their backyard in September that raised $3,000. They posted two yard signs: “Vote No: Don’t limit the freedom to marry,” and “Another Catholic Voting No.” They used their senior citizen classes at St. Thomas University to challenge their age group and other Catholics. Reid spent hours working the Vote No phone banks, working with Minnesota clergy of varying denominations, and driving voters to the polls. Sharon wore her button proudly, using it to open conversations about the proposed amendment and sway voters one by one.

The couple’s tactics during the Vote No campaign is part of what makes the amendment’s defeat unique. All advertisements posted by Minnesotans United for All Families, which headed the campaign, were positive messages of the different forms families can take. “There was not a negative element to it,” noted Reid, “which was nice considering all the negativity in the other commercials of the campaigns.”

The Reids attribute this positivity and the campaign’s grassroots effort as a possible reason for the amendment’s defeat. Sharon said, “I think people like Joe, who worked hard, people that continued to pound the doors and use the phone might have done it.”

The campaign was one of the state’s most expensive. Minnesotans United for All Families, funding the Vote No campaign, garnered $11.2 million in mostly individual private donations. Actor Brad Pitt donated $250,000, and Minnesota celebrities like Vikings’ punter Chris Kluwe and former Gov. Jesse Ventura have appeared on Vote No television ads.

On the other side, the amendment’s proponents kept a lower profile, spending only $3.6 million. The campaign’s relatively low spending may have indicated its confidence that the amendment would pass. In the past, similar elections have demonstrated that 7 percent of voters have traditionally jumped from supporting same-sex marriage to opposing it when they vote. Minnesota for Marriage leaders reportedly counted on that jump for the amendment’s strength. Wednesday, they were thanking supporters for their efforts during the campaign.

Looking forward for Minnesota, and considering the current stance of the state legislature, Reid says he would support a campaign to overturn the 1997 same-sex marriage ban. Tuesday night, he spent an hour at the St. Paul’s River Centre ballroom, where Minnesotans United for All Families had its headquarters.

“There were a lot of happy people there,” he said.



Other Stories in Special Report: Election 2012

Divided Electorate Votes to Give Obama More Time

Alex Jung November 7, 2012

How GenY Voted

Staff of The Beat Covering GenY November 6, 2012

North Carolina: Amendment One and the Black Vote

Alaia Howell November 6, 2012

Swing state students debate: absentee ballot or register at school?

Alyson Penn November 6, 2012

What’ll it Be, Mr. President?

Suzie Hodges November 6, 2012

Stand By Your Man

Cristina Alonso November 6, 2012

Third party candidates: A long shot worth taking?

Joanna Marshall November 6, 2012

Colia Clark, Green Party candidate for Senate, Strives for Change

Robert Tutton November 6, 2012

Hydrofracking Becomes Issue in State Senate Race

Will Dietrich-Egensteiner November 6, 2012

A Warzone of Harassing Comments

Angela Flynn November 6, 2012

Harnessing the Youth Vote in 2012

Alena Hall November 6, 2012

From Assembly to Congress?

laura li November 6, 2012

A group of New Yorkers canvas in Philadelphia

Sarah Gray November 6, 2012

Black Voters Face Pressure from Voting Restrictions and from One Another

Melissa Bailey Diallo November 6, 2012

Chappaqua’s most famous residents: the Clintons

Laura Gurfein November 5, 2012

Chinese-American voters support Obama

Jia Guo November 5, 2012

West Africans views of the 2012 U.S. presidential election

Lauren Morton November 4, 2012

Key voter demographic: homeowners facing foreclosure

Eric Zerkel November 4, 2012

Carbon neutral cupcakes for Obama

Lori-Lee Emshey November 4, 2012

Saturdays for Obama

Laura Entis November 4, 2012

For Politico blogger Alex Burns covering the presidential campaign is science

Alissa Katz November 4, 2012

Brooklyn Tea Party President Runs for NY State Assembly

Renee Jacques November 4, 2012

Upcoming Election Provokes Anxiety for Trans Voters

Alex Jung November 4, 2012

Student’s choice: where one votes matters

Sarah Wentz November 4, 2012

A catch-22 for evangelical Latino voters

Corrie Mitchell November 4, 2012

Knitting and purling for Obama

Megan Soll November 4, 2012

Perspectives on New York’s new Congressional districts

Lila Selim November 2, 2012

American Catholics Divided over Politics of Contraception and Poverty

Peter DAmato November 2, 2012

Felons disenfranchised in New York and other states, despite the law

Emma Quail October 31, 2012

Technology challenges privacy during election campaigns

Anna Callaghan October 31, 2012

US foreign policy success in Burma overshadowed in election

Elizabeth Shim October 31, 2012

Local politicians court city’s Arab-American vote

Jackson Perry October 30, 2012

NYU students hustle to get the vote out

Sara Afzal October 29, 2012

The “Moho” Vote

Nicole Disser October 29, 2012

‘Stamp Stampede’ at Union Square

Morgan Ribera October 25, 2012

Home call centers foster camaraderie among volunteers

Ted Simmons October 18, 2012

Voices outside of the Hofstra Presidential Debate

Colleen Quigley October 16, 2012